<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Year end recommended home theater gear</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2004/12/year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2004/12/year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2004/12/year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear/#comment-119</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:39:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=175#comment-119</guid> <description>I tried to only recommend products I&#039;d seen first hand in the article, but the Fujitsu P50XHA40US you mentioned would likely outperform the Panasonic. I haven’t seen it in person, but in specs alone it would seem to be in another league than the Panasonic. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to only recommend products I&#8217;d seen first hand in the article, but the Fujitsu P50XHA40US you mentioned would likely outperform the Panasonic. I haven’t seen it in person, but in specs alone it would seem to be in another league than the Panasonic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2004/12/year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear/#comment-6416</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=175#comment-6416</guid> <description>I tried to only recommend products I&#039;d seen first hand in the article, but the Fujitsu P50XHA40US you mentioned would likely outperform the Panasonic. I haven’t seen it in person, but in specs alone it would seem to be in another league than the Panasonic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to only recommend products I&#8217;d seen first hand in the article, but the Fujitsu P50XHA40US you mentioned would likely outperform the Panasonic. I haven’t seen it in person, but in specs alone it would seem to be in another league than the Panasonic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2004/12/year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear/#comment-118</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=175#comment-118</guid> <description>I am in the market for either a 42&quot; or 50&quot; plasma.  I am debating between the Fujitsu P50XHA40US (their newest model with the AVM-II processor) or the Panasonic TH-50PHD7UY which you referenced in your year end recommendations.  Do you know whether the Panny still outperforms the new AVM-II chip in the Fujitsu?  I looked at both models in several stores and the Fujitsu appeared crisper than the Panny when viewing a basic 480i signal over satellite.  Any help you could offer would be much appreciated.  Thanks. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in the market for either a 42&#8243; or 50&#8243; plasma.  I am debating between the Fujitsu P50XHA40US (their newest model with the AVM-II processor) or the Panasonic TH-50PHD7UY which you referenced in your year end recommendations.  Do you know whether the Panny still outperforms the new AVM-II chip in the Fujitsu?  I looked at both models in several stores and the Fujitsu appeared crisper than the Panny when viewing a basic 480i signal over satellite.  Any help you could offer would be much appreciated.  Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2004/12/year-end-recommended-home-theater-gear/#comment-6415</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=175#comment-6415</guid> <description>I am in the market for either a 42&quot; or 50&quot; plasma.  I am debating between the Fujitsu P50XHA40US (their newest model with the AVM-II processor) or the Panasonic TH-50PHD7UY which you referenced in your year end recommendations.  Do you know whether the Panny still outperforms the new AVM-II chip in the Fujitsu?  I looked at both models in several stores and the Fujitsu appeared crisper than the Panny when viewing a basic 480i signal over satellite.  Any help you could offer would be much appreciated.  Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in the market for either a 42&#8243; or 50&#8243; plasma.  I am debating between the Fujitsu P50XHA40US (their newest model with the AVM-II processor) or the Panasonic TH-50PHD7UY which you referenced in your year end recommendations.  Do you know whether the Panny still outperforms the new AVM-II chip in the Fujitsu?  I looked at both models in several stores and the Fujitsu appeared crisper than the Panny when viewing a basic 480i signal over satellite.  Any help you could offer would be much appreciated.  Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
