<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: HD envy</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hd-envy</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Marc</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-6124</link> <dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:42:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-6124</guid> <description>I&#039;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#039;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&quot; and I don&#039;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh - makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#39;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&#8243; and I don&#39;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh &#8211; makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marc</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-670</link> <dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-670</guid> <description>I&#039;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#039;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&quot; and I don&#039;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh - makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#8217;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&#8243; and I don&#8217;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh &#8211; makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-669</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-669</guid> <description>Hey Dave,
I&#039;m not sure but if you divide .2 by the number of years it will take them to squeeze that much resolution into a 56” screen, we just might have an answer!
Seriously though, it took manufacturers quite a while just to get 1080p plasmas up to speed but once they did it seemed like an afterthought.
I&#039;m not sure that 4000+ lines of resolution on any screen under say 70” inches or so would even be fully appreciable. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure but if you divide .2 by the number of years it will take them to squeeze that much resolution into a 56” screen, we just might have an answer!</p><p>Seriously though, it took manufacturers quite a while just to get 1080p plasmas up to speed but once they did it seemed like an afterthought.</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure that 4000+ lines of resolution on any screen under say 70” inches or so would even be fully appreciable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-7005</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-7005</guid> <description>Hey Dave,
I&#039;m not sure but if you divide .2 by the number of years it will take them to squeeze that much resolution into a 56” screen, we just might have an answer!
Seriously though, it took manufacturers quite a while just to get 1080p plasmas up to speed but once they did it seemed like an afterthought.
I&#039;m not sure that 4000+ lines of resolution on any screen under say 70” inches or so would even be fully appreciable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure but if you divide .2 by the number of years it will take them to squeeze that much resolution into a 56” screen, we just might have an answer!</p><p>Seriously though, it took manufacturers quite a while just to get 1080p plasmas up to speed but once they did it seemed like an afterthought.</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure that 4000+ lines of resolution on any screen under say 70” inches or so would even be fully appreciable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-668</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-668</guid> <description>Exactly how far away from a 56&quot; set would you have to sit to notice the difference between 1080p and 4320p? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly how far away from a 56&#8243; set would you have to sit to notice the difference between 1080p and 4320p?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-7004</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-7004</guid> <description>Exactly how far away from a 56&quot; set would you have to sit to notice the difference between 1080p and 4320p?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly how far away from a 56&#8243; set would you have to sit to notice the difference between 1080p and 4320p?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whodisbe</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-667</link> <dc:creator>whodisbe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-667</guid> <description>I agree with that 100%.  I was a semi-early adopter of HD.  In my circle of friends, I was the first to get an HD TV, while everyone else was busy waiting for 1080p.  All it took was an hour on Discovery HD, and by the next month I wasn&#039;t the only friend with HD anymore.  Ironically, we were watching the Discovery HD special on Super HiDef. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that 100%.  I was a semi-early adopter of HD.  In my circle of friends, I was the first to get an HD TV, while everyone else was busy waiting for 1080p.  All it took was an hour on Discovery HD, and by the next month I wasn&#8217;t the only friend with HD anymore.  Ironically, we were watching the Discovery HD special on Super HiDef.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: whodisbe</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-7003</link> <dc:creator>whodisbe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-7003</guid> <description>I agree with that 100%.  I was a semi-early adopter of HD.  In my circle of friends, I was the first to get an HD TV, while everyone else was busy waiting for 1080p.  All it took was an hour on Discovery HD, and by the next month I wasn&#039;t the only friend with HD anymore.  Ironically, we were watching the Discovery HD special on Super HiDef.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that 100%.  I was a semi-early adopter of HD.  In my circle of friends, I was the first to get an HD TV, while everyone else was busy waiting for 1080p.  All it took was an hour on Discovery HD, and by the next month I wasn&#8217;t the only friend with HD anymore.  Ironically, we were watching the Discovery HD special on Super HiDef.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
