<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD envy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-6124</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-6124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#039;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&quot; and I don&#039;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh - makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#39;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&#8243; and I don&#39;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh &#8211; makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-670</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#039;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&quot; and I don&#039;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh - makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking to upgrade to HDTV and I&#8217;m having a hard time deciding between CRT, LCD, and rear projection. I think I want a 42&#8243; and I don&#8217;t want plasma because of the half-life and burn-in. The rear projections (e.g.: DLP) bug me, because the bulbs burn out once a year or so and cost a lot of money. LCD can have dead pixels. Sheesh &#8211; makes me just want to have a good old reliable CRT, except that they seem very hard to find now, especially in larger sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Greenway</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,

I&#039;m not sure but if you divide .2 by the number of years it will take them to squeeze that much resolution into a 56” screen, we just might have an answer!

Seriously though, it took manufacturers quite a while just to get 1080p plasmas up to speed but once they did it seemed like an afterthought.

I&#039;m not sure that 4000+ lines of resolution on any screen under say 70” inches or so would even be fully appreciable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure but if you divide .2 by the number of years it will take them to squeeze that much resolution into a 56” screen, we just might have an answer!</p>
<p>Seriously though, it took manufacturers quite a while just to get 1080p plasmas up to speed but once they did it seemed like an afterthought.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that 4000+ lines of resolution on any screen under say 70” inches or so would even be fully appreciable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-668</guid>
		<description>Exactly how far away from a 56&quot; set would you have to sit to notice the difference between 1080p and 4320p?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly how far away from a 56&#8243; set would you have to sit to notice the difference between 1080p and 4320p?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whodisbe</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/hd-envy/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>whodisbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=408#comment-667</guid>
		<description>I agree with that 100%.  I was a semi-early adopter of HD.  In my circle of friends, I was the first to get an HD TV, while everyone else was busy waiting for 1080p.  All it took was an hour on Discovery HD, and by the next month I wasn&#039;t the only friend with HD anymore.  Ironically, we were watching the Discovery HD special on Super HiDef.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that 100%.  I was a semi-early adopter of HD.  In my circle of friends, I was the first to get an HD TV, while everyone else was busy waiting for 1080p.  All it took was an hour on Discovery HD, and by the next month I wasn&#8217;t the only friend with HD anymore.  Ironically, we were watching the Discovery HD special on Super HiDef.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
