<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: TiVo seeks injunction against EchoStar</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar/#comment-627</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 12:14:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=404#comment-627</guid> <description>Dennis,
That’s not exactly the scenario I was envisioning, the fact that DISH saw fit to “apparently” commandeer TiVo’s time-shifting method, without actually licensing their system leaves me inclined to believe that wont change after the ruling.
What I was really insinuating was, how would DISH owners who wouldn’t be to order a DVR at all for the immediate future, feel about TiVo. i.e would they resent TiVo for this.
I don’t see TiVo with DISH as an obvious outcome considering the litigation. But I suppose stranger things have happened. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p><p>That’s not exactly the scenario I was envisioning, the fact that DISH saw fit to “apparently” commandeer TiVo’s time-shifting method, without actually licensing their system leaves me inclined to believe that wont change after the ruling.</p><p>What I was really insinuating was, how would DISH owners who wouldn’t be to order a DVR at all for the immediate future, feel about TiVo. i.e would they resent TiVo for this.</p><p>I don’t see TiVo with DISH as an obvious outcome considering the litigation. But I suppose stranger things have happened.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar/#comment-6959</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=404#comment-6959</guid> <description>Dennis,
That’s not exactly the scenario I was envisioning, the fact that DISH saw fit to “apparently” commandeer TiVo’s time-shifting method, without actually licensing their system leaves me inclined to believe that wont change after the ruling.
What I was really insinuating was, how would DISH owners who wouldn’t be to order a DVR at all for the immediate future, feel about TiVo. i.e would they resent TiVo for this.
I don’t see TiVo with DISH as an obvious outcome considering the litigation. But I suppose stranger things have happened.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p><p>That’s not exactly the scenario I was envisioning, the fact that DISH saw fit to “apparently” commandeer TiVo’s time-shifting method, without actually licensing their system leaves me inclined to believe that wont change after the ruling.</p><p>What I was really insinuating was, how would DISH owners who wouldn’t be to order a DVR at all for the immediate future, feel about TiVo. i.e would they resent TiVo for this.</p><p>I don’t see TiVo with DISH as an obvious outcome considering the litigation. But I suppose stranger things have happened.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar/#comment-626</link> <dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 11:55:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=404#comment-626</guid> <description>&quot;I wonder how some customers who are locked into DISH will feel about TiVo branded products if this injunction goes through.&quot;
-- TiVo on DishNetwork, are you kidding me?  I would LOVE it! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder how some customers who are locked into DISH will feel about TiVo branded products if this injunction goes through.&#8221;</p><p>&#8211; TiVo on DishNetwork, are you kidding me?  I would LOVE it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/05/tivo-seeks-injunction-against-echostar/#comment-6958</link> <dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=404#comment-6958</guid> <description>&quot;I wonder how some customers who are locked into DISH will feel about TiVo branded products if this injunction goes through.&quot;
-- TiVo on DishNetwork, are you kidding me?  I would LOVE it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder how some customers who are locked into DISH will feel about TiVo branded products if this injunction goes through.&#8221;</p><p>&#8211; TiVo on DishNetwork, are you kidding me?  I would LOVE it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
