<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Dwin Plasmaimage HD-250 Review: Part 2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-718</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-718</guid> <description>Bryan, great review! I am a big fan of DWIN and your review proves my preference once again.
I would like to clarify one thing about lack of HDMI for the first commenter. Since this is only a display device and there is no audio handling, HDMI is not really necessary as HDMI and DVI are exactly the same for video signal. If you have any HDMI sources, a simple HDMI-to-DVI cable solves the problem. No active adapter is necessary. And this is not specific to DWIN or any other manufacturer.
Cheers,
Mike </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, great review! I am a big fan of DWIN and your review proves my preference once again.</p><p>I would like to clarify one thing about lack of HDMI for the first commenter. Since this is only a display device and there is no audio handling, HDMI is not really necessary as HDMI and DVI are exactly the same for video signal. If you have any HDMI sources, a simple HDMI-to-DVI cable solves the problem. No active adapter is necessary. And this is not specific to DWIN or any other manufacturer.</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-7052</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-7052</guid> <description>Bryan, great review! I am a big fan of DWIN and your review proves my preference once again.
I would like to clarify one thing about lack of HDMI for the first commenter. Since this is only a display device and there is no audio handling, HDMI is not really necessary as HDMI and DVI are exactly the same for video signal. If you have any HDMI sources, a simple HDMI-to-DVI cable solves the problem. No active adapter is necessary. And this is not specific to DWIN or any other manufacturer.
Cheers,
Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, great review! I am a big fan of DWIN and your review proves my preference once again.</p><p>I would like to clarify one thing about lack of HDMI for the first commenter. Since this is only a display device and there is no audio handling, HDMI is not really necessary as HDMI and DVI are exactly the same for video signal. If you have any HDMI sources, a simple HDMI-to-DVI cable solves the problem. No active adapter is necessary. And this is not specific to DWIN or any other manufacturer.</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-717</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-717</guid> <description>Hi Jason,
The answer is yes and no I suppose. While a high quality external scaler would improve the image quality of just about any display. Dwin’s plasmaimage scaler is tuned specifically for their bundled displays.
But in a broader sense, sure an outboard scaler would be an improvement on many displays. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p><p>The answer is yes and no I suppose. While a high quality external scaler would improve the image quality of just about any display. Dwin’s plasmaimage scaler is tuned specifically for their bundled displays.</p><p>But in a broader sense, sure an outboard scaler would be an improvement on many displays.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-7051</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-7051</guid> <description>Hi Jason,
The answer is yes and no I suppose. While a high quality external scaler would improve the image quality of just about any display. Dwin’s plasmaimage scaler is tuned specifically for their bundled displays.
But in a broader sense, sure an outboard scaler would be an improvement on many displays.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p><p>The answer is yes and no I suppose. While a high quality external scaler would improve the image quality of just about any display. Dwin’s plasmaimage scaler is tuned specifically for their bundled displays.</p><p>But in a broader sense, sure an outboard scaler would be an improvement on many displays.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Tucker</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-716</link> <dc:creator>Jason Tucker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-716</guid> <description>Great review, If I&#039;d not just bought a 50&quot; fuji panel I&#039;d be all over this.
I do need something cleared up a bit. Is the fantastic picture quality because the external box is only doing the one scale to 768 or is a combination of that and the plasma?
If it&#039;s just the box then shouldn&#039;t I be able (if it exists) to hook up that box to my fuji and get increased performance?
Thanks, </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, If I&#8217;d not just bought a 50&#8243; fuji panel I&#8217;d be all over this.</p><p>I do need something cleared up a bit. Is the fantastic picture quality because the external box is only doing the one scale to 768 or is a combination of that and the plasma?</p><p>If it&#8217;s just the box then shouldn&#8217;t I be able (if it exists) to hook up that box to my fuji and get increased performance?</p><p>Thanks,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Tucker</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-7050</link> <dc:creator>Jason Tucker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-7050</guid> <description>Great review, If I&#039;d not just bought a 50&quot; fuji panel I&#039;d be all over this.
I do need something cleared up a bit. Is the fantastic picture quality because the external box is only doing the one scale to 768 or is a combination of that and the plasma?
If it&#039;s just the box then shouldn&#039;t I be able (if it exists) to hook up that box to my fuji and get increased performance?
Thanks,</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, If I&#8217;d not just bought a 50&#8243; fuji panel I&#8217;d be all over this.</p><p>I do need something cleared up a bit. Is the fantastic picture quality because the external box is only doing the one scale to 768 or is a combination of that and the plasma?</p><p>If it&#8217;s just the box then shouldn&#8217;t I be able (if it exists) to hook up that box to my fuji and get increased performance?</p><p>Thanks,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: westcott</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-715</link> <dc:creator>westcott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:59:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-715</guid> <description>Nice review. I have been contemplating the purchase of a flat panel for the master bedroom and I may have to to see if I can audition this display.
My only complaint is that it is not HDMI. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. I have been contemplating the purchase of a flat panel for the master bedroom and I may have to to see if I can audition this display.</p><p>My only complaint is that it is not HDMI.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: westcott</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/06/dwin-plasmaimage-hd-250-review-part-2/#comment-7049</link> <dc:creator>westcott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=423#comment-7049</guid> <description>Nice review. I have been contemplating the purchase of a flat panel for the master bedroom and I may have to to see if I can audition this display.
My only complaint is that it is not HDMI.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. I have been contemplating the purchase of a flat panel for the master bedroom and I may have to to see if I can audition this display.</p><p>My only complaint is that it is not HDMI.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
