<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Star Wars in HD – But Wait There&#8217;s More!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/10/star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/10/star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/10/star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more/#comment-1017</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:34:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=512#comment-1017</guid> <description>Camperton, I didn’t forget, I just don’t find it all that relevant. For better or worse Star Wars is Lucas’s “vision” now whether we agree or disagree with that vision is entirely up to us. Even though I find Lucas’s comments against colorization a bit hypocritical, Star Wars is his “vision” and if he sees fit to mutilate them, then I can appreciate that better than someone else (Ted Turner) defacing another directors work.
In a world of cropped, stretched and otherwise mutilated airings of films that have been altered by the likes of HBO, SHO and Cinemax, I find the airing of any film in its original aspect ratio much more important than what the directed did/didn’t to his own film. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camperton, I didn’t forget, I just don’t find it all that relevant. For better or worse Star Wars is Lucas’s “vision” now whether we agree or disagree with that vision is entirely up to us. Even though I find Lucas’s comments against colorization a bit hypocritical, Star Wars is his “vision” and if he sees fit to mutilate them, then I can appreciate that better than someone else (Ted Turner) defacing another directors work.</p><p>In a world of cropped, stretched and otherwise mutilated airings of films that have been altered by the likes of HBO, SHO and Cinemax, I find the airing of any film in its original aspect ratio much more important than what the directed did/didn’t to his own film.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/10/star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more/#comment-7360</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=512#comment-7360</guid> <description>Camperton, I didn’t forget, I just don’t find it all that relevant. For better or worse Star Wars is Lucas’s “vision” now whether we agree or disagree with that vision is entirely up to us. Even though I find Lucas’s comments against colorization a bit hypocritical, Star Wars is his “vision” and if he sees fit to mutilate them, then I can appreciate that better than someone else (Ted Turner) defacing another directors work.
In a world of cropped, stretched and otherwise mutilated airings of films that have been altered by the likes of HBO, SHO and Cinemax, I find the airing of any film in its original aspect ratio much more important than what the directed did/didn’t to his own film.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camperton, I didn’t forget, I just don’t find it all that relevant. For better or worse Star Wars is Lucas’s “vision” now whether we agree or disagree with that vision is entirely up to us. Even though I find Lucas’s comments against colorization a bit hypocritical, Star Wars is his “vision” and if he sees fit to mutilate them, then I can appreciate that better than someone else (Ted Turner) defacing another directors work.</p><p>In a world of cropped, stretched and otherwise mutilated airings of films that have been altered by the likes of HBO, SHO and Cinemax, I find the airing of any film in its original aspect ratio much more important than what the directed did/didn’t to his own film.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camperton</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/10/star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more/#comment-1016</link> <dc:creator>Camperton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:22:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=512#comment-1016</guid> <description>Well as a film purist aspect ratio is well and good, but this means nothing to me since these will be the ridiculous, defaced &quot;special edition&quot; versions of IV-VI.
If you&#039;re gonna talk about purists, don&#039;t forget to mention that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as a film purist aspect ratio is well and good, but this means nothing to me since these will be the ridiculous, defaced &#8220;special edition&#8221; versions of IV-VI.</p><p>If you&#8217;re gonna talk about purists, don&#8217;t forget to mention that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camperton</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2006/10/star-wars-in-hd-but-wait-theres-more/#comment-7359</link> <dc:creator>Camperton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=512#comment-7359</guid> <description>Well as a film purist aspect ratio is well and good, but this means nothing to me since these will be the ridiculous, defaced &quot;special edition&quot; versions of IV-VI.
If you&#039;re gonna talk about purists, don&#039;t forget to mention that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as a film purist aspect ratio is well and good, but this means nothing to me since these will be the ridiculous, defaced &#8220;special edition&#8221; versions of IV-VI.</p><p>If you&#8217;re gonna talk about purists, don&#8217;t forget to mention that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
