<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Cable TV Subscribers at 17 Year Low</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-1176</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:53:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-1176</guid> <description>If they didn&#039;t count DVRs for cable did they count them for satellite? and maybe its because of the lack luster service from at&amp;t and comcast thats driving people away from cable.  Just a thought. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they didn&#8217;t count DVRs for cable did they count them for satellite? and maybe its because of the lack luster service from at&#038;t and comcast thats driving people away from cable.  Just a thought.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-7523</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-7523</guid> <description>If they didn&#039;t count DVRs for cable did they count them for satellite? and maybe its because of the lack luster service from at&amp;t; and comcast thats driving people away from cable.  Just a thought.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they didn&#8217;t count DVRs for cable did they count them for satellite? and maybe its because of the lack luster service from at&amp;t; and comcast thats driving people away from cable.  Just a thought.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JP</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-1175</link> <dc:creator>JP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:03:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-1175</guid> <description>As Davis points out, I for one am one of those that dropped cable in favour of OTA.  It&#039;s been a real good decision for me so far. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Davis points out, I for one am one of those that dropped cable in favour of OTA.  It&#8217;s been a real good decision for me so far.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JP</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-7522</link> <dc:creator>JP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-7522</guid> <description>As Davis points out, I for one am one of those that dropped cable in favour of OTA.  It&#039;s been a real good decision for me so far.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Davis points out, I for one am one of those that dropped cable in favour of OTA.  It&#8217;s been a real good decision for me so far.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moe</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-1174</link> <dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:25:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-1174</guid> <description>I&#039;m one of those who gave up cable for OTA broadcasts. I generally only watched the local affiliates (CBS and FOX) and when I can get those in high-definition for free with a pair of bunny ears, I didn&#039;t see the value in subscribing anymore. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those who gave up cable for OTA broadcasts. I generally only watched the local affiliates (CBS and FOX) and when I can get those in high-definition for free with a pair of bunny ears, I didn&#8217;t see the value in subscribing anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moe</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-7521</link> <dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-7521</guid> <description>I&#039;m one of those who gave up cable for OTA broadcasts. I generally only watched the local affiliates (CBS and FOX) and when I can get those in high-definition for free with a pair of bunny ears, I didn&#039;t see the value in subscribing anymore.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those who gave up cable for OTA broadcasts. I generally only watched the local affiliates (CBS and FOX) and when I can get those in high-definition for free with a pair of bunny ears, I didn&#8217;t see the value in subscribing anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-1173</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-1173</guid> <description>Good point Davis, yeah I&#039;d be interested to see the actual breakdown. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Davis, yeah I&#8217;d be interested to see the actual breakdown.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-7520</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-7520</guid> <description>Good point Davis, yeah I&#039;d be interested to see the actual breakdown.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Davis, yeah I&#8217;d be interested to see the actual breakdown.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: davis freeberg</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-1172</link> <dc:creator>davis freeberg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-1172</guid> <description>It&#039;s not all satellite and IPTV, a lot of it is OTA customers who don&#039;t want to pay anything for their TV.  It would be interesting to see the breakdown of the remaining 40%. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not all satellite and IPTV, a lot of it is OTA customers who don&#8217;t want to pay anything for their TV.  It would be interesting to see the breakdown of the remaining 40%.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: davis freeberg</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/cable-tv-subscribers-at-17-year-low/#comment-7519</link> <dc:creator>davis freeberg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=571#comment-7519</guid> <description>It&#039;s not all satellite and IPTV, a lot of it is OTA customers who don&#039;t want to pay anything for their TV.  It would be interesting to see the breakdown of the remaining 40%.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not all satellite and IPTV, a lot of it is OTA customers who don&#8217;t want to pay anything for their TV.  It would be interesting to see the breakdown of the remaining 40%.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
