<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matsushita Sells JVC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/matsushita-sells-jvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/matsushita-sells-jvc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: westcott</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/03/matsushita-sells-jvc/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>westcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=570#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>I think Panasonic made a great decision. JVC has not been a name brand that has made much market penetration and the interested buyers you mentioned are probably after the D-ILA technology because that is all they have to offer, IMO.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Panasonic made a great decision. JVC has not been a name brand that has made much market penetration and the interested buyers you mentioned are probably after the D-ILA technology because that is all they have to offer, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
