<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Waiting Game</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-waiting-game</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: gt350</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-1227</link> <dc:creator>gt350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 02:54:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-1227</guid> <description>I agree, oh and just use component inputs because THAT WORKS. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, oh and just use component inputs because THAT WORKS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gt350</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-7576</link> <dc:creator>gt350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-7576</guid> <description>I agree, oh and just use component inputs because THAT WORKS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, oh and just use component inputs because THAT WORKS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-1226</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-1226</guid> <description>Jaime, Bob is still &quot;enjoying&quot; his 11 year old television. Maybe I&#039;ll see him later on this year :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaime, Bob is still &#8220;enjoying&#8221; his 11 year old television. Maybe I&#8217;ll see him later on this year <img
src='http://www.hometheaterblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-7575</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-7575</guid> <description>Jaime, Bob is still &quot;enjoying&quot; his 11 year old television. Maybe I&#039;ll see him later on this year :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaime, Bob is still &#8220;enjoying&#8221; his 11 year old television. Maybe I&#8217;ll see him later on this year <img
src='http://www.hometheaterblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Lewis</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-1225</link> <dc:creator>David Lewis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-1225</guid> <description>Excellent points. The only thing I would add is that many consumers waste too much time searching for the lowest price, and not enough time searching for the right product or the right dealer. Selecting a product because you just read the latest hot review is a big mistake. Spending hours on line trying to find a low price, then trying to get a local installer to match that price, only creates ill-will and guarantees a bad outcome.
As they say in NY, &quot;Pay the $2&quot; and find a reputable dealer that will sell you what you really need. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points. The only thing I would add is that many consumers waste too much time searching for the lowest price, and not enough time searching for the right product or the right dealer. Selecting a product because you just read the latest hot review is a big mistake. Spending hours on line trying to find a low price, then trying to get a local installer to match that price, only creates ill-will and guarantees a bad outcome.</p><p>As they say in NY, &#8220;Pay the $2&#8243; and find a reputable dealer that will sell you what you really need.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Lewis</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-7574</link> <dc:creator>David Lewis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-7574</guid> <description>Excellent points. The only thing I would add is that many consumers waste too much time searching for the lowest price, and not enough time searching for the right product or the right dealer. Selecting a product because you just read the latest hot review is a big mistake. Spending hours on line trying to find a low price, then trying to get a local installer to match that price, only creates ill-will and guarantees a bad outcome.
As they say in NY, &quot;Pay the $2&quot; and find a reputable dealer that will sell you what you really need.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points. The only thing I would add is that many consumers waste too much time searching for the lowest price, and not enough time searching for the right product or the right dealer. Selecting a product because you just read the latest hot review is a big mistake. Spending hours on line trying to find a low price, then trying to get a local installer to match that price, only creates ill-will and guarantees a bad outcome.</p><p>As they say in NY, &#8220;Pay the $2&#8243; and find a reputable dealer that will sell you what you really need.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Griffith</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-1224</link> <dc:creator>Adam Griffith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:04:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-1224</guid> <description>Ah, yes - the waiting game, a dance I&#039;ve done all too often - along with also then later going through exaggerated cases of unjustifiable buyer&#039;s remorse.  It must all be part of that nagging aspect of human nature which suggests &quot;the grass is always greener...&quot;
That and being a videophile who hates to be behind the curve and not *potentially* be able to eek out every little extra bit of picture quality from my beloved movie content.
I bought a top 40-inch Samsung LCD last summer shortly after Samsung had released their new line that very season.  The build of the set and the visual punch of the picture still seem to be among the very best out there.  Yet it&#039;s 1366 x 768p.  And of course, although I&#039;m sure that I can probably see no discernible difference in the picture from where I sit OR may even see a worse level of picture if I recklessly switch to an inferior brand just for 1080p - I still start twitching whenever I read an article that seems to convincingly justify 1080p on certain content.
But then if I did upgrade for 1080p now - it won&#039;t be long before these upcoming sets that boast 10,000 and 20,000 contrast ratios are lowering they&#039;re prices and looking like the best thing on Earth.
Makes me just want to buy an &quot;old&quot;, heavy, and &quot;un-modern&quot; but high-quality CRT (like the Sony XBR970) and then call it a day.  That will at least relieve my resolution and contrast ratio woes (especially for SD DVD), right?  Or will it?
What do you, you all, think?  Is there some new tech. worth waiting for, is something like a Sony CRT a possible solution, or should we just chill and be happy with what we have? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes &#8211; the waiting game, a dance I&#8217;ve done all too often &#8211; along with also then later going through exaggerated cases of unjustifiable buyer&#8217;s remorse.  It must all be part of that nagging aspect of human nature which suggests &#8220;the grass is always greener&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>That and being a videophile who hates to be behind the curve and not *potentially* be able to eek out every little extra bit of picture quality from my beloved movie content.</p><p>I bought a top 40-inch Samsung LCD last summer shortly after Samsung had released their new line that very season.  The build of the set and the visual punch of the picture still seem to be among the very best out there.  Yet it&#8217;s 1366 x 768p.  And of course, although I&#8217;m sure that I can probably see no discernible difference in the picture from where I sit OR may even see a worse level of picture if I recklessly switch to an inferior brand just for 1080p &#8211; I still start twitching whenever I read an article that seems to convincingly justify 1080p on certain content.</p><p>But then if I did upgrade for 1080p now &#8211; it won&#8217;t be long before these upcoming sets that boast 10,000 and 20,000 contrast ratios are lowering they&#8217;re prices and looking like the best thing on Earth.</p><p>Makes me just want to buy an &#8220;old&#8221;, heavy, and &#8220;un-modern&#8221; but high-quality CRT (like the Sony XBR970) and then call it a day.  That will at least relieve my resolution and contrast ratio woes (especially for SD DVD), right?  Or will it?</p><p>What do you, you all, think?  Is there some new tech. worth waiting for, is something like a Sony CRT a possible solution, or should we just chill and be happy with what we have?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Griffith</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-7573</link> <dc:creator>Adam Griffith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-7573</guid> <description>Ah, yes - the waiting game, a dance I&#039;ve done all too often - along with also then later going through exaggerated cases of unjustifiable buyer&#039;s remorse.  It must all be part of that nagging aspect of human nature which suggests &quot;the grass is always greener...&quot;
That and being a videophile who hates to be behind the curve and not *potentially* be able to eek out every little extra bit of picture quality from my beloved movie content.
I bought a top 40-inch Samsung LCD last summer shortly after Samsung had released their new line that very season.  The build of the set and the visual punch of the picture still seem to be among the very best out there.  Yet it&#039;s 1366 x 768p.  And of course, although I&#039;m sure that I can probably see no discernible difference in the picture from where I sit OR may even see a worse level of picture if I recklessly switch to an inferior brand just for 1080p - I still start twitching whenever I read an article that seems to convincingly justify 1080p on certain content.
But then if I did upgrade for 1080p now - it won&#039;t be long before these upcoming sets that boast 10,000 and 20,000 contrast ratios are lowering they&#039;re prices and looking like the best thing on Earth.
Makes me just want to buy an &quot;old&quot;, heavy, and &quot;un-modern&quot; but high-quality CRT (like the Sony XBR970) and then call it a day.  That will at least relieve my resolution and contrast ratio woes (especially for SD DVD), right?  Or will it?
What do you, you all, think?  Is there some new tech. worth waiting for, is something like a Sony CRT a possible solution, or should we just chill and be happy with what we have?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes &#8211; the waiting game, a dance I&#8217;ve done all too often &#8211; along with also then later going through exaggerated cases of unjustifiable buyer&#8217;s remorse.  It must all be part of that nagging aspect of human nature which suggests &#8220;the grass is always greener&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>That and being a videophile who hates to be behind the curve and not *potentially* be able to eek out every little extra bit of picture quality from my beloved movie content.</p><p>I bought a top 40-inch Samsung LCD last summer shortly after Samsung had released their new line that very season.  The build of the set and the visual punch of the picture still seem to be among the very best out there.  Yet it&#8217;s 1366 x 768p.  And of course, although I&#8217;m sure that I can probably see no discernible difference in the picture from where I sit OR may even see a worse level of picture if I recklessly switch to an inferior brand just for 1080p &#8211; I still start twitching whenever I read an article that seems to convincingly justify 1080p on certain content.</p><p>But then if I did upgrade for 1080p now &#8211; it won&#8217;t be long before these upcoming sets that boast 10,000 and 20,000 contrast ratios are lowering they&#8217;re prices and looking like the best thing on Earth.</p><p>Makes me just want to buy an &#8220;old&#8221;, heavy, and &#8220;un-modern&#8221; but high-quality CRT (like the Sony XBR970) and then call it a day.  That will at least relieve my resolution and contrast ratio woes (especially for SD DVD), right?  Or will it?</p><p>What do you, you all, think?  Is there some new tech. worth waiting for, is something like a Sony CRT a possible solution, or should we just chill and be happy with what we have?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jaime</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-1223</link> <dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:15:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-1223</guid> <description>did bob buy the tv or not? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did bob buy the tv or not?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jaime</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-7572</link> <dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-7572</guid> <description>did bob buy the tv or not?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did bob buy the tv or not?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bjarkovic</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-1222</link> <dc:creator>Bjarkovic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:10:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-1222</guid> <description>I agree with you in principle. I did this myself. However, we are talking about a pretty new piece of technology when it comes to HDTVs and I think that waiting for a certain set of options isn&#039;t a silly idea. I waited until I knew I&#039;d get a 1080p set that would perform well, and I&#039;m glad I did. I&#039;d by eating my arms off now if I&#039;d settled for a 720p set.
That said, I believe that we&#039;ve reached a pretty good point when it comes to these things and that I could pretty much be able to tell a person what he or she needs and why, and whether an option they&#039;re holding out for is really worth the wait. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you in principle. I did this myself. However, we are talking about a pretty new piece of technology when it comes to HDTVs and I think that waiting for a certain set of options isn&#8217;t a silly idea. I waited until I knew I&#8217;d get a 1080p set that would perform well, and I&#8217;m glad I did. I&#8217;d by eating my arms off now if I&#8217;d settled for a 720p set.</p><p>That said, I believe that we&#8217;ve reached a pretty good point when it comes to these things and that I could pretty much be able to tell a person what he or she needs and why, and whether an option they&#8217;re holding out for is really worth the wait.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bjarkovic</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/06/the-waiting-game/#comment-7571</link> <dc:creator>Bjarkovic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=589#comment-7571</guid> <description>I agree with you in principle. I did this myself. However, we are talking about a pretty new piece of technology when it comes to HDTVs and I think that waiting for a certain set of options isn&#039;t a silly idea. I waited until I knew I&#039;d get a 1080p set that would perform well, and I&#039;m glad I did. I&#039;d by eating my arms off now if I&#039;d settled for a 720p set.
That said, I believe that we&#039;ve reached a pretty good point when it comes to these things and that I could pretty much be able to tell a person what he or she needs and why, and whether an option they&#039;re holding out for is really worth the wait.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you in principle. I did this myself. However, we are talking about a pretty new piece of technology when it comes to HDTVs and I think that waiting for a certain set of options isn&#8217;t a silly idea. I waited until I knew I&#8217;d get a 1080p set that would perform well, and I&#8217;m glad I did. I&#8217;d by eating my arms off now if I&#8217;d settled for a 720p set.</p><p>That said, I believe that we&#8217;ve reached a pretty good point when it comes to these things and that I could pretty much be able to tell a person what he or she needs and why, and whether an option they&#8217;re holding out for is really worth the wait.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
