http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=3d-revisited Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-5991 B.Greenway Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:49:06 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-5991 Hey Sam, absolutely its a subjective experience. I wouldn't even rule out changing my mind, maybe I just haven't had the right set of circumstances line up yet. Hey Sam, absolutely its a subjective experience. I wouldn’t even rule out changing my mind, maybe I just haven’t had the right set of circumstances line up yet.

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-7659 B.Greenway Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:49:00 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-7659 Hey Sam, absolutely its a subjective experience. I wouldn't even rule out changing my mind, maybe I just haven't had the right set of circumstances line up yet. Hey Sam, absolutely its a subjective experience. I wouldn’t even rule out changing my mind, maybe I just haven’t had the right set of circumstances line up yet.

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-1302 SamInNorthCakalakey Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:26:35 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-1302 Not sure I agree. I saw Superman at IMAX in 3D and it was great. I since have seen it many times and those viewings pale in comparison. True Superman was had only 20 minutes of 3D and it was strategically placed but it shows that it can enhance the movie if done correctly, at least for me. Not sure I agree. I saw Superman at IMAX in 3D and it was great. I since have seen it many times and those viewings pale in comparison. True Superman was had only 20 minutes of 3D and it was strategically placed but it shows that it can enhance the movie if done correctly, at least for me.

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-7658 SamInNorthCakalakey Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:26:00 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-7658 Not sure I agree. I saw Superman at IMAX in 3D and it was great. I since have seen it many times and those viewings pale in comparison. True Superman was had only 20 minutes of 3D and it was strategically placed but it shows that it can enhance the movie if done correctly, at least for me. Not sure I agree. I saw Superman at IMAX in 3D and it was great. I since have seen it many times and those viewings pale in comparison. True Superman was had only 20 minutes of 3D and it was strategically placed but it shows that it can enhance the movie if done correctly, at least for me.

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-1301 pb Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:40:17 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-1301 I saw the IMAX 3d this past weekend...I would not have gone to the theater to watch if it was not in 3d. Aside from the splitting head ache that started to develop 3/4 of the way into the movie, I had a blast! I saw the IMAX 3d this past weekend…I would not have gone to the theater to watch if it was not in 3d. Aside from the splitting head ache that started to develop 3/4 of the way into the movie, I had a blast!

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-7657 pb Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:40:00 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-7657 I saw the IMAX 3d this past weekend...I would not have gone to the theater to watch if it was not in 3d. Aside from the splitting head ache that started to develop 3/4 of the way into the movie, I had a blast! I saw the IMAX 3d this past weekend…I would not have gone to the theater to watch if it was not in 3d. Aside from the splitting head ache that started to develop 3/4 of the way into the movie, I had a blast!

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-1300 Murray Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:32:13 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-1300 Even if you could get 3D without any glasses or any other discomfort, it will never be more than a novelty. It might improve mediocre action films, but good stories make great films, not effects. And that's never going to change. If James Cameron truly thinks otherwise, he's a fool. But more than anything I suspect he just sees dollar signs. Even if you could get 3D without any glasses or any other discomfort, it will never be more than a novelty. It might improve mediocre action films, but good stories make great films, not effects. And that’s never going to change. If James Cameron truly thinks otherwise, he’s a fool. But more than anything I suspect he just sees dollar signs.

]]> http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/11/3d-revisited/#comment-7656 Murray Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:32:00 +0000 http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=619#comment-7656 Even if you could get 3D without any glasses or any other discomfort, it will never be more than a novelty. It might improve mediocre action films, but good stories make great films, not effects. And that's never going to change. If James Cameron truly thinks otherwise, he's a fool. But more than anything I suspect he just sees dollar signs. Even if you could get 3D without any glasses or any other discomfort, it will never be more than a novelty. It might improve mediocre action films, but good stories make great films, not effects. And that’s never going to change. If James Cameron truly thinks otherwise, he’s a fool. But more than anything I suspect he just sees dollar signs.

]]>