<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over 70 Million Connected Homes by 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>absolutely spot on Greenway. Gigabit networking is the way to go, and these days most of the devices are ethernet equipped. 

I&#039;d say CAT5e &amp; termination accessories are cheaper, still carries gigabit.

Jason
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely spot on Greenway. Gigabit networking is the way to go, and these days most of the devices are ethernet equipped. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say CAT5e &amp; termination accessories are cheaper, still carries gigabit.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Greenway</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-4565</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, CAT5, CAT6, wi-fi, PLC, two tin cans with a piece of string in the middle, whatever works best for you.

CAT5 has just become a generic term for a “data cable” to us over the years, old habits die hard. But sure, use CAT6 if that’s what you have, I wouldn’t sweat it though, 100Mbps is still 100Mbps faster than 0Mbps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, CAT5, CAT6, wi-fi, PLC, two tin cans with a piece of string in the middle, whatever works best for you.</p>
<p>CAT5 has just become a generic term for a “data cable” to us over the years, old habits die hard. But sure, use CAT6 if that’s what you have, I wouldn’t sweat it though, 100Mbps is still 100Mbps faster than 0Mbps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Weston</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re pulling new cable, shouldn&#039;t it be Cat6? You need that for gigabit, right? With the speed of wireless increasing, 100Mbps hardly seems to be worth the effort of pulling wire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re pulling new cable, shouldn&#8217;t it be Cat6? You need that for gigabit, right? With the speed of wireless increasing, 100Mbps hardly seems to be worth the effort of pulling wire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
