<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Over 70 Million Connected Homes by 2012</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-5506</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:03:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-5506</guid> <description>absolutely spot on Greenway. Gigabit networking is the way to go, and these days most of the devices are ethernet equipped.
I&#039;d say CAT5e &amp; termination accessories are cheaper, still carries gigabit.
Jason </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely spot on Greenway. Gigabit networking is the way to go, and these days most of the devices are ethernet equipped.</p><p>I&#8217;d say CAT5e &amp; termination accessories are cheaper, still carries gigabit.</p><p>Jason</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-7715</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-7715</guid> <description>absolutely spot on Greenway. Gigabit networking is the way to go, and these days most of the devices are ethernet equipped.
I&#039;d say CAT5e &amp; termination accessories are cheaper, still carries gigabit.
Jason</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely spot on Greenway. Gigabit networking is the way to go, and these days most of the devices are ethernet equipped.</p><p>I&#8217;d say CAT5e &amp; termination accessories are cheaper, still carries gigabit.</p><p>Jason</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-4565</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-4565</guid> <description>Hey Mike, CAT5, CAT6, wi-fi, PLC, two tin cans with a piece of string in the middle, whatever works best for you.
CAT5 has just become a generic term for a “data cable” to us over the years, old habits die hard. But sure, use CAT6 if that’s what you have, I wouldn’t sweat it though, 100Mbps is still 100Mbps faster than 0Mbps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, CAT5, CAT6, wi-fi, PLC, two tin cans with a piece of string in the middle, whatever works best for you.</p><p>CAT5 has just become a generic term for a “data cable” to us over the years, old habits die hard. But sure, use CAT6 if that’s what you have, I wouldn’t sweat it though, 100Mbps is still 100Mbps faster than 0Mbps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: B.Greenway</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-7714</link> <dc:creator>B.Greenway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-7714</guid> <description>Hey Mike, CAT5, CAT6, wi-fi, PLC, two tin cans with a piece of string in the middle, whatever works best for you.
CAT5 has just become a generic term for a “data cable” to us over the years, old habits die hard. But sure, use CAT6 if that’s what you have, I wouldn’t sweat it though, 100Mbps is still 100Mbps faster than 0Mbps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, CAT5, CAT6, wi-fi, PLC, two tin cans with a piece of string in the middle, whatever works best for you.</p><p>CAT5 has just become a generic term for a “data cable” to us over the years, old habits die hard. But sure, use CAT6 if that’s what you have, I wouldn’t sweat it though, 100Mbps is still 100Mbps faster than 0Mbps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Weston</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-4562</link> <dc:creator>Mike Weston</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:23:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-4562</guid> <description>If you&#039;re pulling new cable, shouldn&#039;t it be Cat6? You need that for gigabit, right? With the speed of wireless increasing, 100Mbps hardly seems to be worth the effort of pulling wire.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re pulling new cable, shouldn&#8217;t it be Cat6? You need that for gigabit, right? With the speed of wireless increasing, 100Mbps hardly seems to be worth the effort of pulling wire.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2008/04/over-70-million-connected-homes-by-2012/#comment-7713</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=669#comment-7713</guid> <description>If you&#039;re pulling new cable, shouldn&#039;t it be Cat6? You need that for gigabit, right? With the speed of wireless increasing, 100Mbps hardly seems to be worth the effort of pulling wire.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re pulling new cable, shouldn&#8217;t it be Cat6? You need that for gigabit, right? With the speed of wireless increasing, 100Mbps hardly seems to be worth the effort of pulling wire.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
