<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knocked out by Natal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: comfort_sleeper</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6235</link>
		<dc:creator>comfort_sleeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>While I love this idea, I couldn&#039;t help but thinking about holding back until version 2 comes out. There has to be some flaws to the first version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love this idea, I couldn&#39;t help but thinking about holding back until version 2 comes out. There has to be some flaws to the first version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comfort_sleeper</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>comfort_sleeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>While I love this idea, I couldn&#039;t help but thinking about holding back until version 2 comes out. There has to be some flaws to the first version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love this idea, I couldn&#39;t help but thinking about holding back until version 2 comes out. There has to be some flaws to the first version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgreenway</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator>bgreenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6176</guid>
		<description>pteittinen, fair on all counts, although I&#039;d say there are plenty xbox360 users who are quite content using their consoles as media extenders, its those users I would expect to drive any Natal control integration forward, not necessarily the hardcore home theater enthusiasts. I don&#039;t recall where but I seem to remember seeing the claim that the 360 was the number one media center extender in-use by huge margin. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the dimly lit theaters, you know in a true home theater setting I would wholeheartedly agree, I also think the number of Xbox360&#039;s connected to &quot;true&quot; home theaters is pitifully low. But the low-light consideration is a good point and one I hadn&#039;t considered fully. That still leaves the voice integration but I suppose one could argue that a soundtrack at reference volumes would render that moot too, but then again who listens at reference volumes aside from us home theater freaks?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess my failing here (as evidenced by Bjarki&#039;s comment) was not clarifying that this type of technology, not necessarily Natal itself could really be a boon to home automation and system control. Clearly though we need a clean break from pounding on remotes for that to happened, Natal&#039;s as good as example as any as to what we would stand to gain from that break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pteittinen, fair on all counts, although I&#39;d say there are plenty xbox360 users who are quite content using their consoles as media extenders, its those users I would expect to drive any Natal control integration forward, not necessarily the hardcore home theater enthusiasts. I don&#39;t recall where but I seem to remember seeing the claim that the 360 was the number one media center extender in-use by huge margin. </p>
<p>As to the dimly lit theaters, you know in a true home theater setting I would wholeheartedly agree, I also think the number of Xbox360&#39;s connected to &#8220;true&#8221; home theaters is pitifully low. But the low-light consideration is a good point and one I hadn&#39;t considered fully. That still leaves the voice integration but I suppose one could argue that a soundtrack at reference volumes would render that moot too, but then again who listens at reference volumes aside from us home theater freaks?</p>
<p>I guess my failing here (as evidenced by Bjarki&#39;s comment) was not clarifying that this type of technology, not necessarily Natal itself could really be a boon to home automation and system control. Clearly though we need a clean break from pounding on remotes for that to happened, Natal&#39;s as good as example as any as to what we would stand to gain from that break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pteittinen</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>pteittinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6175</guid>
		<description>BG, while I was quite impressed with Natal demos, I think you are reaching a bit with all this talk about home theater applications. First off, MS will very likely bind the tech to work with Xbox only (at least initially) and we all know how useless their beige box is for HT use. Second, I&#039;m pretty sure Natal requires plenty of light to work properly. Sure, it&#039;s got IR vision but that&#039;s not enough on its own -- and that CMOS camera will be as blind as a bat in a typical dim-lit HT room, let alone a proper batcave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BG, while I was quite impressed with Natal demos, I think you are reaching a bit with all this talk about home theater applications. First off, MS will very likely bind the tech to work with Xbox only (at least initially) and we all know how useless their beige box is for HT use. Second, I&#39;m pretty sure Natal requires plenty of light to work properly. Sure, it&#39;s got IR vision but that&#39;s not enough on its own &#8212; and that CMOS camera will be as blind as a bat in a typical dim-lit HT room, let alone a proper batcave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgreenway</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6169</link>
		<dc:creator>bgreenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6169</guid>
		<description>Chris a little skepticism is wise and I wouldn&#039;t be at all surprised if its not everything they promise at launch. I&#039;m just fascinated by the idea and the fact they&#039;re this far along, plenty of time to hone and perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris a little skepticism is wise and I wouldn&#39;t be at all surprised if its not everything they promise at launch. I&#39;m just fascinated by the idea and the fact they&#39;re this far along, plenty of time to hone and perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B. Behrens</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6168</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B. Behrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6168</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m VERY skeptical about this technology. I remember the impressions I had of the Wii controller in early tech demos, only to be heartily disappointed with the reality, in terms of precision and accuracy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I could think while I was watching the one girl in the reverse-dodgeball demo was &quot;left leg, knee kick, step, one, two...must...appear...spontaneous!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m VERY skeptical about this technology. I remember the impressions I had of the Wii controller in early tech demos, only to be heartily disappointed with the reality, in terms of precision and accuracy. </p>
<p>All I could think while I was watching the one girl in the reverse-dodgeball demo was &#8220;left leg, knee kick, step, one, two&#8230;must&#8230;appear&#8230;spontaneous!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgreenway</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6166</link>
		<dc:creator>bgreenway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6166</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure It wouldn&#039;t work with a flat, two-dimensional image, examples of biometrics are already in use today for things much more sophisticated than home security. Even so, sure that might not be the level of functionality everyone&#039;s comfortable with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m pretty sure It wouldn&#39;t work with a flat, two-dimensional image, examples of biometrics are already in use today for things much more sophisticated than home security. Even so, sure that might not be the level of functionality everyone&#39;s comfortable with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjarki Gudjonsson</title>
		<link>http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2009/06/knocked-natal/#comment-6165</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjarki Gudjonsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hometheaterblog.com/?p=1366#comment-6165</guid>
		<description>I agree, I think there are a lot of great possibilities with this tech. Home security, however, I don&#039;t think is one of them. I don&#039;t want someone to walk up to my house holding up my picture and being let in on facial recognition...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I think there are a lot of great possibilities with this tech. Home security, however, I don&#39;t think is one of them. I don&#39;t want someone to walk up to my house holding up my picture and being let in on facial recognition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
